The presidency has responded to criticism over the recently approved N10 billion solar energy project for Aso Rock, Nigeria’s presidential compound.
According to the presidency, this initiative represents a strategic investment in sustainable energy solutions despite the significant cost.
READ ALSO: Tinubu reportedly met suspended Rivers gov Fubara in London
The project has sparked considerable public debate, with many questioning both the expense and timing amid Nigeria’s ongoing economic difficulties and widespread concerns about government expenditure patterns.
Critics have also pointed out what they perceive as inconsistency in the administration’s energy policies.
Some argue that the government’s transition to solar power for the presidential residence contradicts earlier commitments to improve the national power infrastructure for all Nigerians.
Addressing these concerns on Tuesday evening, Presidential spokesperson Bayo Onanuga issued a statement through his official X account defending the decision.
Onanuga emphasized that the solar installation aligns with international practices at similar governmental headquarters, noting that even the White House in Washington, D.C. incorporates solar energy in its power infrastructure. “The White House in Washington D.C. uses solar power,” Onanuga stated.
“We are not reinventing the wheel. We are following a tested and globally accepted model for powering important national institutions sustainably.”
He shared the post alongside a video showcasing the transition to solar energy at the U.S. Presidential residence, urging Nigerian leaders to lead by example in adopting renewable energy technologies.
It would be recalled few days ago, the Federal Executive Council (FEC) approved a N10 billion budget for the installation of solar power systems at the Presidential Villa.
The decision, however, drew criticism from many Nigerians, who questioned the appropriateness of such a large expenditure given the country’s current economic challenges.
Despite the backlash, the Presidency maintains that the project is a forward-thinking and environmentally responsible initiative. It argues that depending on diesel-powered generators to meet the Villa’s energy demands is both financially burdensome and harmful to the environment.
“This isn’t just about saving money on fuel and maintenance costs in the long run; it’s about leading by example. If the President’s residence can go green, so can other institutions across Nigeria,” Onanuga added.
